Nigerian activist Deji Adeyanju has openly condemned TikToker Peller for advising Nigerians to stop the #30DayRants challenge.
The viral campaign started after Ushie Uguamaye, an NYSC member known as Raye, shared her hardships under President Tinubu’s government.
Her story encouraged others to speak out about their struggles, amplifying public discontent with the current socio-economic conditions.
Peller, however, argued during a livestream that the criticism could lead to TikTok’s ban in Nigeria.
Since the platform is his main income source, he feared losing access.
His statement quickly drew sharp criticism, with many accusing him of selfishness.
Critics believe his stance disregards the broader societal issues Nigerians face daily.
Among them is Adeyanju, who strongly rebuked Peller’s position on social media.
In a Facebook post featuring Peller’s photo, Adeyanju wrote, “Who is this boy telling people not to rant on TikTok? Is TikTok your father’s house? Shouldn’t you be in school instead? Are you not too young for TikTok? You have no right to dictate how Nigerians express their frustration!”
His reaction mirrors widespread anger over attempts to suppress free expression. Many view the #30DayRants challenge as a vital outlet for holding leaders accountable.
The backlash against Peller underscores the conflict between personal interests and collective activism.
While TikTok offers income opportunities, it also fuels political discourse.
Critics argue silencing dissent weakens democracy and stifles necessary conversations.
As the #30DayRants movement grows, it continues to spark debates on free speech and civic engagement.
The situation highlights how digital platforms balance entertainment with activism, shaping Nigeria’s socio-political landscape.
Ultimately, the controversy reflects deeper tensions about accountability and freedom in the digital age.
Nigerians increasingly use social media to demand change, making platforms like TikTok crucial for advocacy.
Peller’s remarks have intensified discussions on whether individual concerns should override public expression. As the movement evolves, its impact on Nigeria’s governance discourse remains significant, proving that digital spaces are now central to national dialogue.
